|
|
|
ÇãÇý°æ ( Hur Hea-Kung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
¹Ú¼Ò¹Ì ( Pakr So-Mi ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú ±è±â°æ ( Kim Ki-Kyong ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú Á¤Áö¼ö ( Jung Ji-Soo ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø °£È£Çаú ½ÅÀ±Èñ ( Shin Yun-Hee ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú ÃÖÇâ¿Á ( Choi Hyang-Ok ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: To evaluate the applicability of Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) as an evaluation tool for hypoglycemia simulation practicum on Korean nursing students. Methods: The methodological study was done to evaluate the reliability and validity of the LCJR. Based on Benner¡¯s 4 levels of nursing grading rubric, ten items of the LCJR was evaluated for interrater reliability and internal consistency. The content validity was tested by eight experts and concurrent validity was done by Clark (2006)¡¯s clinical simulation grading rubric. Fifty five video-taped cases of senior nursing students in Y University were used for the reliability and concurrent validity of the LCJR. Results: The interrater reliability was r=.90 (p<.001); Kendall tau b=.87 (p <.001), and Cronbach¡¯s alpha was .90. A value of item content validity index of the LCJR was .97 and correlation coefficient between the LCJR and Clark¡¯s instrument was .90 (p<.001). The mean () of the nursing students¡¯ clinical judgment was 2.04 (). Conclusion: The LCJR is a useful tool to examine the simulation performance evaluation for improving competency among nursing students. The results indicated that the LCJR may provide valuable information regarding clinical judgment of nursing students and thus, suggested to use to develop a simulation-based education program.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
ÀÓ»óÆÇ´Ü, ·çºê¸¯, ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ç, ÀúÇ÷´ç
Clinical judgment, Rubric, Simulation, Hypoglycemia
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|